Drewes Law
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact

Eighth Circuit Deals A Blow to Consumers

12/8/2014

0 Comments

 
The Eighth Circuit in McIvor v. Credit Control Services, Inc. struck down a consumer claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act last week, making it more difficult for consumers to bring claims against debt collectors who violate federal law. A quick rundown:

Credit Control Services was attempting to collect an unpaid car insurance bill from Sarah McIvor. Sarah, however, had paid this debt to the original creditor years earlier. When CCS put the debt on her Trans Union credit report, she wrote a letter to Trans Union stating that she did not owe the money and asked that it remove the debt. Following a federal law called the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Trans Union sent Sarah's dispute to CCS, and, under the same law, CCS was required to investigate the dispute and return the results to Trans Union. CCS refused to remove the debt, and sent Trans Union an "all clear" on the information.

Under the FDCPA, debt collectors like CCS are required to "communicate that a disputed debt is disputed." This requirement was set with credit reporting in mind: Trans Union, and the other credit bureaus Experian and Equifax, remove debts marked as 'disputed' from consideration when calculating your credit score (to oversimplify, they don't find disputed debts reliable enough to use). Which makes CCS' "all clear" communication to Trans Union a problem, because under the FDCPA it was required to mark the account as 'disputed.'

The court, however, got hung up on CCS's argument that Trans Union already knew about the dispute, and so the "all clear" update lacking mention of it was not "false, deceptive, or misleading." This ignores one salient fact: that Trans Union rubber stamps whatever CCS and any other creditor sends it. Trans Union relies on collectors and creditors to provide it debt information, knowing little about these accounts itself, so if CCS does not mark an account as 'disputed,' Trans Union will not report it as disputed. In Sarah's case, this hurt her credit-- remember, calling the account 'disputed' removes it from her credit score calculation.

The 8th Circuit declined to take judicial notice of this fact, however, and dismissed the case.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    The attorneys of Drewes Law have access to post and edit the blogs. Attorney Bios.

    Archives

    December 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    RSS Feed

    Submit a Report 
​Drewes Law, PLLC
509 First Avenue NE, Suite 2
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Alt. Logo
​Phone: 612.285.3051
Fax: 612.285.3062
Email: 
info@dreweslaw.com

This website is designed to provide general information only and the information contained herein should not be construed as legal advice. You are NOT a "client" of the firm without express consent of Drewes Law, PLLC, regardless of your use or review of this website, your contact with the firm, or unsolicited payment made to the firm.
               
​
(c) 2017 Drewes Law, PLLC
Header photo credits: Mark Zastrow
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact
✕